Buster Keaton wonderful work of art

Buster Keaton wonderful work of art

https://www.facebook.com/Wolffianclassicmoviesdigest

I am a very huge fan of Buster Keaton. I would say i adore his work so much. He is one of the biggest joys for me to watch his work on screen as he simply is a wonderful act to watch on screen. I would say he ranks among the best of comedy legends all time to my eyes. Buster kreaton is simply one of the true founders of visual comedy and modern comedy in so many ways so to talk him is a real joy now for The Tenth Annual Buster Keaton Blogathon today as today I talk about his wonderful shorts as also pay tribute to this wonderful legend of the silver screen.

hard luck review

Hard Luck was reportedly one of Keaton’s favorite short films – that for more than 60 years was feared lost. Luckily for us, a nearly complete version was founded and restored in the early 2000s. Unluckily for us, it does not include the final gag of the film that Keaton insisted out the biggest laugh of all his gags – with only a description and a single still surviving. It’s better than nothing. At some point though, perhaps fearing 20 minutes of attempted suicides would be too much, Keaton switches gears. He gets hired to track down an armadillo for a zoo – that apparently has every other kind of animal. This leads Keaton out to the wild – the best sequence of which has him fishing. He catches a small fish, and decides to use it for bait to catch a bigger one – and then does the same thing again and again until the fish becomes ridiculously big and he tries one time too often. Hard Luck is one of his best shorts sadly with its missing final gag that makes it feel less rewarding to us now but yet what remains still is a timeless

The Scarecrow review

“The Scarecrow” opens with a scene that deftly establishes the relationship between the two main characters, roommates Buster and Joe, but it revolves around a gag that isn’t terribly funny. As a result, I didn’t have high hopes for what was going to follow, but then the film got into gear and ended up becoming one of the funniest things I’ve seen. From the Rube Goldberg contraptions that permeate the main characters’ living space, through the business involving the titular scarecrow, and the film’s three spectacular chase scenes, viewers are treated to 15 minutes of amazing prop-based and physical comedy. The longest chase involves Keaton being pursued by a dog he believes is rabid and if you don’t find it hilarious then you are probably dead inside–or just plain dead. (I included the dog among my list of stars at the top of this review, because it performed as well as its human co-stars!) as this is really so funny to watch and enjoy form start to finish.

The boat review

At 27 minutes this is a very short filmt but don’t see that as a setback. It’s a hilarious story about how not to launch a boat, and then what not to do at sea.

In the film Buster in his boater builds a boat in his garage and destroys his house as he tows it to the dock to go cruising. The boat is called Damfino and you can imagine Buster acquiring the name after being asked what she was called by each and every visitor to the Balboa Island, Newport Beach, California set. It’s also, if you lip-read, the last line in the film!

Two boats were made for the film by Buster’s technical guy Fred Gabourie, who managed to make the boat of the launching scene sink by attaching it to rails and pulling it underwater with cables.

With his wife, played with unerring trust by Sybil Seely (who tries to launch the boat with a bottle of coke), Buster embarks on a weekend afloat, en famille, which is supposed to be a safe and happy cruise, but in which he manages to completely destroy… just about everything. With stunts from him being knocked overboard by his patent mast-lowering system – for shooting bridges, to studio footage of the boat being rolled and finally some dark scenes of a captain going down with his ship (until he surfaces under his hat) this is both an hilarious and at times salutary film with moments that can still make you laugh out loud on the umpteenth viewing.

Buster plays the whole film with his stock-in-trade stoneface, which gives the piece a wonderfully forlorn air while his wife and their two young sons, who are not credited, form an uncomplaining cast. Apparently James Mason, another great actor of sea films, found this film when he bought Buster’s house in the 1950s as this classic comedy gem really stands out.

The High Sign review

The high sign is one of the best buster Keaton shorts with a ton of amazing athleticism and stunts and tons of gags it really packs a punch. The gags of the high sign are wonderful to watch form its simple gags to the surreal gags. Buster Keaton creates many fun gags that all really stand out with such charm to each of them they make you crack up and laugh instantly. Most silent shorts are long on gags but short on plot but this one has his character working in pawnshop and his character climbing houses as it shows many different facets on this short. Buster Keaton packs in an awful lot of locations and characters in 19 minutes making it a very jam packed short that will bring you joy to watch anytime on the screen.  The short ends with Keaton cavorting through a tricked-out house booby-trapped and full of secret passages that shows off physicality and visual inventiveness that is truly ahead of its time in so many ways as it showcases what inventive nature of him as a flim-maker as he truly makes one outstanding little gem of a short.

Convict 13 review

Convict 13 sees Buster accidentally break into jail only to be mistaken for a death-row inmate. Buster’s relationship with the warden’s daughter eventually lands him a job as the assistant warden after preventing an attempted escape of another prisoner. Revealed as a dream sequence, this far-fetched non-stop and surprisingly violent comedy is a surreal nightmare for Buster from which he eventually awakens, only to find himself back on the golf course. It is one of my favorite shorts as something so fun about watching buster do such things as he really has such charm in each scene. There is non-stop comedy gold that really showcases the master-class of buster’s comedy work as an actor. This is one fun little gem of a short

The Goat review

Buster Keaton’s The Goat is one of his very best shorts. Slightly longer than most of Keaton’s shorts as it runs at 27 minutes instead of 2 the film’s energy never lets up as it proceeds at a breakneck pace from start to finish. In the film, Keaton stars as a poor young man who we first see in a breadline although by the time it’s his turn, there’s no bread left for him. Walking along hungry and alone, he stops by and peaks into a jail cell just as the infamous Dead Shot Dan is about to have his picture taken from the “Rogue’s Gallery” but of course, sometime goes wrong, Keaton has his picture taken instead, and when Dead Shot Dan escapes shortly thereafter, it’s Keaton’s picture that gets distributed around town. This movie has as several great, extended chase sequences. After escaping from multiple police men chasing him – including an hilarious sequence where Keaton is stuck on a telephone pole by his jacket – he makes a daring train escape to another town. He saves a young woman (Virginia Fox) from a ruffian – but when he sees his face on a wanted poster, he thinks he may have killed the other man. Frequent co-star Joe Roberts then tries to chase Keaton down but once again, Keaton outwits him. When he runs into Fox again, he accepts her invitation to dinner. But wouldn’t you know it – Roberts is her father, and the chase resumes this time with Keaton making brilliant use of an elevator I’m not sure any of Keaton’s shorts more resembles a live action Looney Tunes cartoon than this one. When Keaton wants the elevator to arrive at his floor quickly he simply moves the arm above the door that indicates what floor it’s on to his thus ensuring its prompt arrival. Later, when he wants to get rid of Roberts, he cranks that arm well past its end point  and the elevator goes crashing through the roof (the special effects there are not exactly convincing but this is 1921 we’re talking about). The whole film plays like a live action Bugs Bunny cartoon – which is all the more impressive when you consider that Keaton is more bound by the laws reality than a cartoon character is. This one is a short masterwork by Keaton.

cops review

The plot of Cops! is straightforward, and I think that’s really what makes this short so fun to watch. Buster Keaton’s un-named character (only credited as Young Man) is chased all over Los Angeles by cops after misbehaving during a city parade as simple as the story sounds its not only such fun to watch unfold as With such a simple plot, the writing by Edward F. Cline and Keaton himself makes for just a quick, fun watch. It’s only 18 minutes long, but provides lots of visual antics that really showcase him in such a fun little short gem.

The Electric House review

The Electric House is another great Buster Keaton short that highlights his delight in all things mechanical on the screen.  The Electric House is probably the high point so far of Keaton using technology for laughs as he truly does such wonders with all things mechanical on the screen. The Electric House is a pure joy to watch unfold on the screen with its many wonderful moments to watch unfold on the screen. History buffs will know Keaton broke his ankle filming the escalator scene and had to put the film on hold as he dusted off an old short until the next year then re-shot everything from starch to perfection to make this gem as he would make it into something of outstanding little gem of a short that showcases his wonderful craft at work.

The Haunted House review

PLOT: Buster Keaton is a bank teller at a bank where one of the managers is running a crooked side “business” to fleece customers of their cash. Orchestrating an “inside job” the wayward co-worker’s henchman attempt to rob Buster. Through a series of mishaps that leave Buster’s hands filled with glue, he is able to turn the tables on the would-be-robbers. In the process, however Buster is caught with a gun stuck in one hand and cash stuck to the other, leading the owner of the bank to suspect Buster of the crime. Buster takes refuge in a tricked-out house which is also doubling as the hideout for his crooked co-worker and gang. Meanwhile, an acting troupe run off the stage for their horrible performance of “Faust” also hide in the house. Between the various contraptions like collapsing staircases and trap doors as well as thugs dressed like ghosts and skeletons… and let’s not forget the devil Faust wandering about – Buster must clear his name, catch the crooks, get the girl and keep from being scared!

the cartoon logic of Keaton’s shorts in particular, and THE HAUNTED HOUSE carries that energy. The Great Stoneface not so bravely encounters all kinds of great optical illusions and visual gags that don’t really make sense in our reality; it’s an elevated reality, but not quite impossible. But then, when Keaton “dies,” he climbs up a beautifully realized vision of steps up to heaven (eerily similar to Fritz Lang’s DESTINY of the same year). And in typical Keaton forthrightness, he has his fictional facsimile sent right back down to Hell. This sequence, which turns out to be a dream/concussion hallucination, perfectly closes a madcap, fantastical short with a true fantasy sequence.

The structure of the film, which doesn’t ever really cross into “comedy horror” (since it doesn’t even have enough of the minimal “horror”) a la the Universal movies of the late 1920s, nevertheless sets a precedent for those to come. Many of them are never truly supernatural, with some Scooby Doo revelations that make clear the magical things were improbable Rube Goldberg-esque machinations and people in costumes. Besides the comedy horror film, the “old dark house” subgenre (not necessarily to be confused with James Whale’s apparently played-straight THE OLD DARK HOUSE [1932]) is THE HAUNTED HOUSE’s specific form.

As mentioned, it wasn’t necessarily the first. In its most primeval form, Georges Méliès could be considered the pioneer of this aesthetic (and many others). His spooky Faustian films and early haunted house pictures are manic, fantastical, comic, and spooky. During the 1910s, there were a few other shorts that could have crossed into the territory, including, and this is a bit of a stretch, THE GOLEM AND THE DANCING GIRL (1917). But heading into the 1920s, THE HAUNTED HOUSE distinguished itself with a more distinct goal. And by the end of the decade, the aforementioned Universal films and others solidified the concept. Movies like THE MONSTER (1925), THE BAT (1926), THE CAT AND THE CANARY (1927), THE GORILLA (1927), OUR GANG and other comedy shorts, and more are the clear products of early experimentation that morphed into the full-fledged genre of the ’40s and the proliferation of the concept across pulp and “B” grade media, most notably comic books as this flim is perfection to really say the least as its such fun to watch upon the screen.

Buster Keaton the Art of the Gags.

He had been starting to tell the stories trough his visual story-telling.  Every single fall is a chance for comedy gold. Never fake a gag is buster’s one rule. Buster’s world is flat, and he goes by a rule  if the camera can’t see it, neither can the character. So he creates jokes that make sense visually, but not logically. Characters can move up, down, right, or left toward the camera, or away from the camera  creating humor in geometry. Or the camera is positioned back far enough so we can see the shape of the gag. as you see his works in many great modern actors as he was the greatest of all the clowns. Buster always would tell the story trough the visual cues or actions as buster believed that you never do the same thing twice as every single fall is a chance to do more action in the scene. visual gags work best in many angles.

Keaton adopted his famous deadpan look whilst involved in the stage show having learned that he could obtain a greater laugh if he didn’t show any emotion whilst hurtling through the air! Nobody liked a laughing child being thrown at them.

He wanted his audience to trust the gag was real, so for this reason he would never make a cut. They would either get the gag in one shot or it would be thrown out. For this, he is remembered not just for his skill, but also his integrity. And just as they say in the video: “No advancement in technology can mimic this.” It’s true. Buster Keaton gives us the real thing for any gag. The house falling on  Buster Keaton  was amazing because apparently weighed about 2 tons and for the window measurements, to quote Keaton, “I had a clearance of two inches on each shoulder, and the top missed my head by two inches and the bottom my heels by two inches. We mark that ground out and drive big nails where my two heels are going to be. Now we had to make sure that we were getting our foreground and background wind effect, but that no current ever hit the front of that building when it started to fall, because if the wind warps her she’s not going to fall where we want her, and I’m standing right out front. But it’s a one-take scene and we got it that way. You don’t do those things twice yet as this comedy moment often was said to be a moment many future comics would look at in awe of what he does on screen.

Buster Keaton’s classic gags

The scene from Buster Keaton’s classic “Sherlock Jr” that resulted in Keaton breaking his neck, though he wouldn’t realize until years later when a routine medical revealed a callous had grown over the decade old fracture as he did this wonderful stunt that showcased his magical power of being buster.

Related image

The gag itself is straightforward or so it seems to be that way.  Buster comes into Arbuckle’s store to buy a bucket of molasses,putting his coin in the bucket. Arbuckle fills up the bucket without seeing the money, and then, aggravated about having to fish out the coin, gets revenge by pouring molasses into Buster’s hat. The hat then gets stuck on Buster’s head. Further complications ensue when Buster’s shoe also gets stuck to the floor with the molasses its one of his older gags that was one of my favorite types of his gags.

Camera Man: Buster Keaton by Dana Stevens Review

I really adore buster Keaton as I brought this remarkable book off Amazon about the man. Film critic Dana Stevens offers a look at Keaton’s life and career in her book Camera Man: Buster Keaton, The Dawn of Cinema, and the Invention of the 20th Century. This is a life-and-times style book rather than a traditional biography as it offers readers both biography and cultural history which places its subject, in this case Buster Keaton, in context with the eras they lived through. You won’t get a play-by-play on everything that happened in Keaton’s life and career. Instead, Stevens’s offers a look at Keaton through a cultural history lens and readers with reap the rewards from the entire historical context to his life as a whole. The chapters are thematic essays that follow the course of Keaton’s life chronologically but each focus on a particular subject with a couple of context points. here is also in-depth biographical information on key figures from Keaton’s life and career including Keaton’s three wives, Roscoe Arbuckle, Robert Sherwood, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Louis B. Mayer, Irving Thalberg, Charlie Chaplin and more. These context points make for some illuminating reading and really help readers understand Keaton’s world. You would be hard pressed to find any greater man to read about then him. You’d be hard-pressed to find a more beloved figure from film history than Buster Keaton. He’s wowed generations of moviegoers, some born several decades after his death in 1966, with his physical comedy and incredible stunt work. And he did it all with a straight face. Who can forget the house frame falling over Keaton in Steamboat Bill Jr. (1928), the death-defying stunts in The General (1926), Keaton running over train cars and onto a water tower in Sherlock Jr. (1924) or the epic chase scenes in Seven Chances (1925)? He did it all himself, no stuntman needed and made it look effortless. Keaton was also a pioneer in filmmaking. He thrived in the era before studios took over Hollywood. With his years of vaudeville training, he knew what audiences liked and developed that on a bigger scale for moviegoers. With the birth of cinema, he learned as he went, preferring to work independently and often writing, “choreographing” and directing his own feature films and shorts. Today Keaton’s work is appreciated by many, even those who are new to classic movies. You’ll hear those who are normally adamantly against watching black-and-white movies from the past being open and willing to watching Keaton perform his magic on screen so this book is clearly a must read today.

Sherlock Jr review

Sherlock Jr. is a film that uses every trick in the book to produce electrifying moments of comedy that can still thrill audiences today. It is also a shrewd representation of the place of film in our lives. The poster shows Buster Keaton as a detective and as a beloved (projectionist). The credits merely list him in his parenthetical capacity, and in fact this occupation embraces the central part of the film, which takes the audience on a journey full of twists and turns that is very clearly related to the first part of the story. 

Action, comedy, fantasy, or romance, what exactly is Sherlock Jr.? The answer is that it’s all of those genres without ever fully committing to being any one of those genres. There are fantasy elements at play in Sherlock Jr., but the elements of comedy, romance, and action are also present. Buster Keaton’s film easily avoids genre classification because it willingly plays around in the different genres it includes within its whole. The comedy need not stop for the fantasy to be formed, just as the action doesn’t have to exit the screen in order for the romance to work. The narrative of Sherlock Jr. moves seamlessly from one genre to another so that I never felt like I was watching a film in one specific genre. Rather, I was watching one whole film, and a masterful film at that showcases his skills as a flim-maker. There’s not much I can say about Mr. Keaton that hasn’t already been said, or even that I haven’t said already. He is a master of the big screen.

There’s an allure to Mr. Keaton because of how easily he takes control of a film and makes it his own. Throughout all of Sherlock Jr. he keeps his tried and true stone face completely set in stone. His eyes though, his eyes tell so much of the story. And when he does allow for some sort of facial expression, it’s as if the film explodes. Mr. Keaton is such a strong presence that Sherlock Jr. would be a fine film even if his screen presence were all the movie had going for it. You don’t need to be a fan of Buster Keaton to love Sherlock Jr., but you must be a fan of movies in general. Of course, if you’re not, then why the heck would you be reading this blog or care about Buster Keaton in the first place? As a better ending, go and watch Sherlock Jr., even if you’ve seen it before, you’ll have a great time in watching this classic trust me about that one.

Review: Seven Chances (1925)

Seven Chances is a brilliant comedy which exercises Keaton’s timing, elasticity and subtleties. Keaton learns he is the sole inheritor of a grand fortune provided he is married by seven o’clock on his twenty seventh birthday. Which happens to be today for this man.  Less an innovative masterpiece of the Sherlock Jr variety, it is a pure entertainment and one of the most enduring movies he did. The second half is pure Keaton with one of the greatest and grandest chases. After the town learns of the impending seven million dollar inheritance, every unattached lady swarms to his request for a wife. Of course, it never is simple for Keaton as he also discovers his true love is waiting for him at home, ready to forgive an earlier mistake. In a mad race against time, Keaton escapes endless swarms of women, swings atop cranes, dodges avalanches and survives car crashes. It is an exhausting sequence of athleticism, laughs and gasps that seem like a Looney tune moment but its buster in all his ways as it captures what makes him remarkable. Seven Chances is a brilliant comedy classic that is a must see gem for anyone.

Steamboat Bill, Jr. review

I reckon a great many people know the most famous image from Buster Keaton’s 1928 silent film “Steamboat Bill Jr.” even if they haven’t seen “Steamboat Bill Jr.” The image is that of Keaton as the title character standing on the street in front of a building when the building collapses, falls forward, right on top of him, only to spare him simply because he happens to be positioned right in the line of the open attic window. Of course, what many people may not remember or know is the full context of this moment and what lead to that very moment. The runs at 71 minutes as Keaton’s film feels less threadbare than chock full in a good way telling the story of a son attempting to earn the tough-love of his father intermingled with a star cross’d love affair “Romeo and Juliet” style recast in Dixieland. And Bill Jr. proves his worth to all and to himself in the midst of that third act cyclone, battling elements both meteorological and emotional that really is such fun to watch unfold on screen.

You can guess how it all ends up but you can’t necessarily guess how they get there, and they get there via set pieces both small and large but all wonderful. The storm that takes Keaton all over town and eventually to the steamboat and then to the water is a miracle of moviemaking, modern or otherwise, making these latter day computer generated effects, no matter how groundbreaking, appear tame and uninspired. It’s strange because even though Keaton is famous for doing his own stunts you never sense palpable danger, perhaps because of the hand cranked cameras which evoke a live action cartoon, yet in spite of that it all seems so alive.

This, I think, goes back to the acting choices he makes, to battle so nobly even if he often comes across so helpless. Ask a person what they appreciate most about life and almost universally he or she will be quick to list, before anything else, the person he or she loves and his or her family. Yet these people so near and dear to us are forever at the whim of the world, mother nature, something beyond our control. Bill Jr. can’t control what is happening in this glorious, breathtaking third act climax, but he perseveres anyway – as if the world around him is a place he does not understand but has faith in anyway.

The Navigator review

One of the interesting things I’ve found is that, in going buster kreaton’s works as they all stand out as such remarkable showcases of art that showcase his wonderful work as both actor and film-maker.  Less well known than other Keaton classics such as The General (1926) or Steamboat Bill Jr (1928), The Navigator is none the less, a superb comedy, well constructed, beautifully executed and consistently funny. Keaton’s big stunt in The Navigator is an impressive dive from the deck of the ship into the waters below to save his girlfriend, a distance of at least 50 feet. But as with The Goat most of the best laughs come from Keaton’s response to particular situations for example the look he gives at the prospect of having to haul his unconscious girlfriend the ship’s ladder to get back on deck. And his deadpan humour is to the fore in the way he nonchalantly produces a new hat each time his existing one is blown off by the wind or how he idly buffs his nails on the spinning treadmill.  And the great gag of the indolent  Treadway’s use of his chauffer driven limo to cross the road to his girlfriend’s house is almost immediately eclipsed by his decision to take a ‘long walk’ back home to clear his head that makes it a remarkable comedy gem that was one of his favorite films as he would say this movie is a must seeclassic.

College (1927)

College is a hilarious short Buster Keaton feature. It is just over an hour. Their is a rumor that Keaton cut a football sequence to avoid comparison to Harold Lloyd’s college themed film, The Freshman, released two years earlier. My favorite sequence is when he goes out for the baseball team. He has no clue what he is doing. Three players on the side bust a gut laughing at all of his ridiculous attempts. My favorite moment is when he runs around the bases thinking he is about to score. He slides into home head first, then flips his body over. The Great Stone Face looks so serious doing it all, only to find out that the ball was caught and he never tagged up. The film is still hilarious today. Super-dynamic, it’s not boring at all and it’s only an hour long, the right amount of time to develop a simple story and offer a lot of great slapstick comedy. There’s also some subtler irony in several places, as in Roland’s speech against sport made by Buster Keaton who, in reality, was an exceptionally athlete! The construction of the scenes is, especially in the central part, a bit repetitive (an athlete does something perfectly, then Keaton follows and fails: repeat the formula x times), but I was impressed by some scenes, for example when slow motion is used as a special effect of the fall slowed by the open umbrella.This movie is not one of his most known works but still a fun film to watch.

Why i adore buster kreaton so much

I simply adore Buster Keaton because he simply could make any simple gag and many complex gags all work together as I went through his shorts i found that he simply is marvelous with his timing that he manages make any gag truly stand out by his timing as he makes simple gags and many ladder gags all stand out. He is also a wonder with mechanical gags and he adored trains and other modes of transport as he would often use them in his gags and shorts.  He did westerns a few times that managed poke fun at the western in fun ways before western spoofs were a thing. It is truly remarkable managed do so many wonderful gags and stunts without help of anyone. I would say that some of my biggest belly laughs came from viewing Buster’s short films.   I would say he ranks among the best of comedy legends all time to my eyes. Buster kreaton is simply one of the true founders of visual comedy and modern comedy that i adore so much as i hoped you enjoyed my talk about him today as he was such fun to talk about today.

THE GLASS BOTTOM BOAT Spies among us.

THE GLASS BOTTOM BOAT Spies among us

Jennifer Nelson (Doris Day) works at an aerospace lab, but moonlights as a mermaid to boost sales for her father’s glass-bottom boat company. When her coworker, Bruce Templeton (Rod Taylor), accidentally hooks her costume while fishing, he is smitten. Back at work, Bruce brings her in as his biographer — a pretense for wooing her. Meanwhile, inept security agents Julius Pritter (Dom DeLuise) and Homer Cripps (Paul Lynde) wrongfully peg Jennifer as a Soviet spy, causing all sorts of problems. Today i talk about a spy spoof of bond movies which was very common in this era as its another wonderfully delightful comedy by doris day as i talk about this classic comedy gem today.

The plot is on the preposterous side, Day suspected as a spy infiltrating Taylor’s aerospace research operation. It’s partly a James Bond spoof that plays upon the 60’s spy movie craze of that era. when her dog is called Vladimir you can see where the movie is headed – with all sorts of crazy gadgets. But mostly the plot serves to illustrate Day’s substantial gifts as a comedienne. For an actress at the top of her game, she is never worried about looking foolish as its such fun and a delight to watch. And that’s part of her appeal. She may look sophisticated even when, as here, playing an ordinary public relations girl, but turns clumsy and uncoordinated at the first scent of comedic opportunity. There’s some decent slapstick and pratfalls and some pretty good visual gags that really showcase her skills as a natrual comedy legend.

Director Frank Tashlin responsible for Son of Paleface (1952) and The Girl Can’t Help It (1956) crafts out a comedy classic which was made In the midst of the Russian/American space race (1957 – 1969), this film emerged, which reflected the pulse and the styles of the day, all with a light-hearted, comic twist of a flim. she gets tangled up with Rod Taylor as “Bruce Templeton whom is wonderful in his role.

Physical Comedy. Director Frank Tashlin was no stranger to slapstick. His background prior to this film was directing cartoons for Warner Brothers from the 1930s and several Jerry Lewis films. When THE GLASS BOTTOM BOAT runs through frenzied scenes of chaotic comedy and pantomime that showcases his talents as a director for this type of flim.

The supporting cast is excellent, especially as they begin to form suspicions of Jennifer. Any laugh that isn’t provided by Day is certainly provided by one of these supports (Paul Lynde, Edward Andrews and others) as they all follow her, attempt to collect evidence against her and plot to unmask her. Dom Deluise is the best of the bunch. Rod Taylor’s performance is solid as well, though nowhere near as charismatic or likable as Doris. An actor who had more magnetic chemistry with Doris could have been chosen, but they make it work and are convincing enough as a couple.

This is one of Doris Day’s funniest comedies, and a gem of a spy film as well. Though I will always prefer her films with Rock Hudson, I highly recommend The Glass Bottom Boat as this movie is truly marvelous to watch upon the screen. as i do another post that facebook blocked upon i am gonna give you a treat to share it here. as below is my other blog post of day.

The Incredible Melting Man (1977) is so bad its good

Posted on 

The Incredible Melting Man (1977) is so bad its good

Astronaut exposed to cosmic rays outside of Saturn’s rings returns to Earth and begins to melt away. Escaping from the hospital, he wanders around the backwoods looking for human flesh to eat is the plot of this bad yet its good classic which i review today for the Sixth So Bad It’s Good Blogathon as it truly as lets begin the talks about this classic.

The Incredible Melting Man is probably most remembered now for being featured in the seventh season of Mystery Science Theater 3000. I thought it was a good but somewhat odd fit for the show, as it was a bit more gruesome than what they typically featured on that show. This movie is not a spectacular movie by any stretch of the imagination but the special effects are pretty decent for a late 70s low budget American International picture of its time. That Credit for that goes to the accomplished and now legendary Rick Baker. While the effects aren’t as refined as his style would later become as it still stands out as showcasing his skills at the craft.

A fun cult oddity from 1977, AIP’s The Incredibly Melting Man may have been the subject of an MST3K riff fest once upon a time but the film stands on its own as a fun monster movie even without commentary from the Satellite of Love’s crew. When the film begins, an astronaut named Steve West (Alex Rebar) and a few other crewmembers are geeking out over how awesome Saturn looks from their space capsule. When Steve’s nose starts bleeding and the other two astronauts pass out, something has obviously gone wrong. The next time we see Steve he’s laying wrapped up in a hospital bed. He wakes up and realizes that something happened to him out there in space, something that’s causing his flesh to literally melt off of his skeleton. He snaps, and after attacking a chubby nurse in a tight fitting outfit, he busts out of the hospital and into the woods nearby where he rips the head off of a fisherman enjoying a cold Coors sixteen-ouncer and terrorizes some kids enjoying found creek porn which seems about right for a horror movie see teens doing porn.

The authorities are alerted and at this point we meet Dr. Ted Nelson (Burr Debenning), a NASA medical big wig who has to find Steve and figure out what the Hell happened to him before the next Saturn mission launches. So armed with a Geiger counter and some help from General Mike Perry (Myron Healy), a portly guy who enjoys a good nap, Ted heads out into the woods to find Steve who has busied himself terrorizing a photographer who has in turn been busying himself by trying to take nudie shots of Cheryl ‘Rainbeaux’ Smith. As West’s humanity disintegrates along with his skin, he runs around causing a ruckus, leaving bits and pieces of himself here and there and eating people. He even goes after Ted’s in-laws, a randy couple out to steal some oranges on a night time drive to visit their daughter, Judy (Ann Sweeny), and his husband. Will Ted and General Perry be able to stop Steve before he obliterates everyone around him and possibly even save him while there’s still something left of him to save?

As wacky as you’d expect a movie about a melting man to be from the director of Galaxina and Van Nuys Blvd., this film features some impressive and fairly early effects work from the great Rick Baker, who appears to have bought an endless supply of what looks like condensed milk and food coloring to make the melting effects happen. Amazingly enough, they work incredibly well and the vast majority of this movie’s appeal is going to stem from those effects scenes.

The acting is pretty hokey, the story fairly predictable (though you’ve got to give the filmmakers credit for going with a surprisingly dark ending) and the stock footage that the beginning that is supposed to be of Saturn looks more like stock footage of the sub but regardless, this movie is a blast if you don’t feel the need to take it too seriously. And why would you want to as its just not meant be taking for much more then a movie.

There’s definitely a twisted sense of humor to much of this film, if it’s not obvious from the melting man himself it’s painfully obvious in the scene involving Dr. Ted’s horny in-laws and their midnight citrus crime spree. The film definitely borrows elements from Phantom From Space and from Frankenstein and it feels more like a fifties sci-fi/monster movie than a typical seventies horror film but that’s hardly a bad thing. This is, after all, a movie about a melting cannibal named Steve who rips the heads off of random fishermen and chases nurses through plate glass windows for no reason – and it’s just as ridiculously fun as it should be as i hope you enjoyed my look upon this movie for the Sixth So Bad It’s Good Blogathon so just enjoy the classics folks as i hope you enjoyed this look upon two classics in one post.

The Incredible Melting Man (1977) is so bad its good

The Incredible Melting Man (1977) is so bad its good

Astronaut exposed to cosmic rays outside of Saturn’s rings returns to Earth and begins to melt away. Escaping from the hospital, he wanders around the backwoods looking for human flesh to eat is the plot of this bad yet its good classic which i review today for the Sixth So Bad It’s Good Blogathon as it truly as lets begin the talks about this classic.

The Incredible Melting Man is probably most remembered now for being featured in the seventh season of Mystery Science Theater 3000. I thought it was a good but somewhat odd fit for the show, as it was a bit more gruesome than what they typically featured on that show. This movie is not a spectacular movie by any stretch of the imagination but the special effects are pretty decent for a late 70s low budget American International picture of its time. That Credit for that goes to the accomplished and now legendary Rick Baker. While the effects aren’t as refined as his style would later become as it still stands out as showcasing his skills at the craft.

A fun cult oddity from 1977, AIP’s The Incredibly Melting Man may have been the subject of an MST3K riff fest once upon a time but the film stands on its own as a fun monster movie even without commentary from the Satellite of Love’s crew. When the film begins, an astronaut named Steve West (Alex Rebar) and a few other crewmembers are geeking out over how awesome Saturn looks from their space capsule. When Steve’s nose starts bleeding and the other two astronauts pass out, something has obviously gone wrong. The next time we see Steve he’s laying wrapped up in a hospital bed. He wakes up and realizes that something happened to him out there in space, something that’s causing his flesh to literally melt off of his skeleton. He snaps, and after attacking a chubby nurse in a tight fitting outfit, he busts out of the hospital and into the woods nearby where he rips the head off of a fisherman enjoying a cold Coors sixteen-ouncer and terrorizes some kids enjoying found creek porn which seems about right for a horror movie see teens doing porn.

The authorities are alerted and at this point we meet Dr. Ted Nelson (Burr Debenning), a NASA medical big wig who has to find Steve and figure out what the Hell happened to him before the next Saturn mission launches. So armed with a Geiger counter and some help from General Mike Perry (Myron Healy), a portly guy who enjoys a good nap, Ted heads out into the woods to find Steve who has busied himself terrorizing a photographer who has in turn been busying himself by trying to take nudie shots of Cheryl ‘Rainbeaux’ Smith. As West’s humanity disintegrates along with his skin, he runs around causing a ruckus, leaving bits and pieces of himself here and there and eating people. He even goes after Ted’s in-laws, a randy couple out to steal some oranges on a night time drive to visit their daughter, Judy (Ann Sweeny), and his husband. Will Ted and General Perry be able to stop Steve before he obliterates everyone around him and possibly even save him while there’s still something left of him to save?

As wacky as you’d expect a movie about a melting man to be from the director of Galaxina and Van Nuys Blvd., this film features some impressive and fairly early effects work from the great Rick Baker, who appears to have bought an endless supply of what looks like condensed milk and food coloring to make the melting effects happen. Amazingly enough, they work incredibly well and the vast majority of this movie’s appeal is going to stem from those effects scenes.

The acting is pretty hokey, the story fairly predictable (though you’ve got to give the filmmakers credit for going with a surprisingly dark ending) and the stock footage that the beginning that is supposed to be of Saturn looks more like stock footage of the sub but regardless, this movie is a blast if you don’t feel the need to take it too seriously. And why would you want to as its just not meant be taking for much more then a movie.

There’s definitely a twisted sense of humor to much of this film, if it’s not obvious from the melting man himself it’s painfully obvious in the scene involving Dr. Ted’s horny in-laws and their midnight citrus crime spree. The film definitely borrows elements from Phantom From Space and from Frankenstein and it feels more like a fifties sci-fi/monster movie than a typical seventies horror film but that’s hardly a bad thing. This is, after all, a movie about a melting cannibal named Steve who rips the heads off of random fishermen and chases nurses through plate glass windows for no reason – and it’s just as ridiculously fun as it should be as i hope you enjoyed my look upon this movie for the Sixth So Bad It’s Good Blogathon so just enjoy the classics folks

birth of the batman:the dark knight rebirth:Denny O’Neil tribute

Denny O’Neil has shaped modern Batman more than any other creator. And while he consciously sought to put the ‘dark’ in ‘Dark Knight,’ part of what makes his output so appealing is the fact that the ‘knight’ side is usually there as well O’Neil’s Batman is well-travelled, chivalrous, brave, and certainly not above some good old fashioned swordplay as also reshaped batman’s comics back to its golden age roots of the darker batman would come to define what modern batman is like today as his batman would be very much at home in tim burton’s batman movie. I started loving batman as a young boy so i talk about one of the greatest writers of batman ever.

BATMAN 244

Take O’Neil’s first issues, in the early 1970s. These featured mostly done-in-one solo stories sans Robin that unapologetically embraced the pulpy conventions of the material. Most of them were adventure yarns in which Bruce Wayne would roam the world with the bat-cowl in his suitcase and no one ever found it suspicious that he and Batman would always show up in the same places. More than a strong-willed powerhouse, the Caped Crusader was depicted as a deductive genius and master of disguise, although still fallibly human. Villains would leave him to die in an elaborate deathtrap rather than simply kill him and Batman would inevitably escape through a clever loophole in the trap.

Taking advantage of Neal Adams’ and Irv Novick’s atmospheric pencils, beautifully inked by Dick Giordano, Denny O’Neil’s earlier tales were unabashedly gothic and full of over-the-top purple prose. His debut story, ‘The Secret of the Waiting Graves,’ starts by asking readers to ‘Stand still and hear the wind howling like souls in torment… see the rise of an ashen moon… breathe deeply and sniff the scent of death…’ Given the prowess of the artists working on these comics, O’Neil’s narrative captions are mostly unnecessary in terms of storytelling, but his poetic flights of fancy help create a genuinely eerie mood. ‘Legend of the Key Hook Lighthouse!’ even kicks off in verse:

O’Neil would later take his literary affectations to the extreme in the brilliant ‘Death Strikes at Midnight and Three,’ which is part dense prose, part experimental montage, and 100% hardboiled goodness.

Denny O’Neill was also great at murder mysteries, which is no small feat when you have around 15 pages to set up the crime, introduce the cast of suspects, and throw in enough red herrings to make it challenging. What’s more, as these were fair play mysteries, his comics often included a neat panel directly daring the reader to spot the necessary clue to solve the puzzle.

No tale combines all these trademarks as powerfully as the classic ‘Ghost of the Killer Skies!’ which features a foreign setting (Spain), a gratuitous yet exciting death-defying challenge that Batman has to overcome through ingenuity (air battle between vintage aircraft), elaborate prose adorning Neal Adams’ majestic drawings (‘Leave now the eyes of the dread Batman and follow the caped avenger through a tangle of crime and into the bleakest corner of a man’s soul and an intriguing whodunit premise (a pilot strangled in mid-air, in a single-seater plane Throw in an anti-war message and the ghost of Enemy Ace the German WWI pilot of the amazing war comics by Robert Kanigher and Joe Kubert and you’ve got one hell of a story in your hands! As if all this was not enough to ensure Denny O’Neil a firm place in Bat-history, he created two of the most fascinating characters in the Batman cast – love interest Talia al Ghul and her father, the megalomaniac, repeatedly resuscitated, eco-terrorist Ra’s al Ghul. Most of these comics, reprinted in the Tales of the Demon collection, have become so engrained in the imagination of Bat-fans that it is easy to miss the slow-burn build-up of the original saga… At first sticking to the formula of done-in-one stories, O’Neil kept revealing new layers and gradually escalating the stakes until what started as typical Batman mini-adventures culminated in arguably the most memorable showdown of the Caped Crusader’s career. In the otherwise forgettable Detective Comics #405, Batman bodyguards a shipping magnate by facing kamikaze dolphins (where do you think the Soviets got the idea from?) and a martial arts killer, only to realize that his opponent belongs to a much vaster League of Assassins. In the following issue, the Dark Knight has his first confrontation with the League’s president, Ebenezer Darrk – despite the villain’s uninspired name, this is a nice little tale of secret passages, medieval traps, double-crosses, and last-minute escapes. Also, it opens with a bang

Detective Comics #408, scripted by Len Wein (with an even more gothic voice than O’Neil’s), is tangentially related to the Masked Manhunter’s feud with the League of Assassins, without adding much to the overall saga. Neal Adams draws some breathtaking hallucinations, but reading the issue means stomaching one of Batman’s most racialized foes, namely the Fu Manchu-inspired Dr. Tzin-Tzin (whose only redeeming quality as a character is that a few years later he stole all knowledge of Christmas from Gotham City, which even for Gotham standards is a pretty eccentric heist). Dr. Darrk meets his demise in Detective Comics #411  yet instead of bringing closure to the story arc, this instalment hints at an even more complex web of international intrigue. Readers meet Talia al Ghul, whose father had a falling out with Darrk ‘over some sort of business.’ We are definitely in grand adventure territory here. Accepting the genre’s inherent orientalism, O’Neil combined different cultures with gusto in order to provide an out-of-this-world sense of exotic excitement: the tale takes place in an unidentified Far East country ‘a tiny Asian nation tucked into the mountains between two hostile super-powers’); we are told Ra’s al Ghul is Arabic for ‘The Demon’s Head;’ a plot point involves arms deals in South America; and in a great sequence Batman literally has to bullfight for his life. O’Neil followed this with Batman #232, where the Caped Crusader wrestles a leopard in Calcutta and climbs one of the Himalayan Mountains, under fire. The stakes feel higher than usual – Robin gets shot in the very first page and Ra’s al Ghul makes his entrance by revealing that he has figured out Batman’s secret identity.

The big picture continues to unfold, as we are introduced to Ubu and to the Brotherhood of the Demon. Ra’s is not even revealed as the villain until the end… and even then his motivation appears to be a melancholic wish to retire and to satisfy his daughter’s infatuation with Bruce. Indeed, in Batman #235 and Batman #240 the Dark Knight is still willing to trust and even partner up with Ra’s and Talia, whom he apparently doesn’t yet consider all that evil… although the al Ghuls’ decision to remove the brain of the director of a think tank in order to extract confidential information about the Vietnam War finally changes that. It’s with Batman #242 that the narrative picks up speed, turning into a no-holds-barred rollercoaster ride. Batman fakes Bruce Wayne’s death on the first page. By page 5, the Dark Knight himself is apparently murdered. We are introduced to Matches Malone, who will remain Bruce’s moustachioed slimy crook alter-ego for the following decades. There is a plot twist on every page as Batman rounds up a ragtag team (‘a reluctant scientist, a superstitious bandit, and a dead gangster’) to wage war against Ra’s al Ghul and his hordes of trained soldiers. By Batman #243 we’re in full-on James Bond mode, with a dynamic martial arts combat, proto-Bond girl Molly Post (who sadly only reappeared one more time, in Detective Comics #451), and henchmen getting knocked out all over the place as the heroes make their way to the villain’s lair in the Swiss Alps. This is also the issue in which we learn that a dead Ra’s al Ghul can be brought back to life by being dipped in the magical Lazarus pit. The whole thing climaxes in Batman #244, where the Caped Crusader chases a hovercraft on a pair of skis, duels Ra’s under the burning desert sun, gets poisoned by a deadly scorpion, passionately kisses Talia, and saves the world, although not before bursting into one of the most iconic Batman panels of all time in all his hairy chest glory

BATMAN 244 Batman #245 serves as an epilogue, wrapping up the Bruce-Wayne-is-dead plot thread. It is dated October 1972, two years after the saga first started on the pages of Detective Comics. After this globetrotting extravaganza, Denny O’Neil’s Batman stories grew increasingly urban, most famously in ‘There is No Hope in Crime Alley!’ where O’Neil established the place where Bruce Wayne’s parents were killed – Park Row, now known as Crime Alley. He also created the character of Leslie Thompkins, the kind old woman who represents all that’s worth saving in Gotham City and who became a recurrent character in the Dark Knight universe.

The comic became such an instant classic that the sequel, written 3 years later, directly echoed its beginning of crime alley one of batman’s greatest staples to his orgin story which danny created as also created Arkham Asylum.

detective comics 483These are cornerstone Batman comics, which not only heavily inspired Mike W. Barr but also the awesome Batman: The Animated Series episode ‘Appointment in Crime Alley.’ The latter of these issues also marks the debut of Maxie Zeus, the crime boss who swears to anyone who’ll listen that he is an actual Greek god. Besides introducing new elements into the Batman mythos, Denny O’Neil did a great job of breathing life into old villains who hadn’t been seen for years. Out of all the classic rogues he brought back, O’Neil’s most lasting update concerned the Clown Prince of Crime

After three decades of being depicted as little more than a wacky prankster, under O’Neil the Joker returned to his roots as a sadistic murderer. His take on this rogue proved so popular that O’Neil even spun it into its own series, where the Joker faced off against other characters. as joker’s new modern shape helped bring about what would later to the modern joker as we know today which would become into batman 89’s joke as joker doing party man is what danny would have done for him as ledger’s remarkable joker both clips below of each version of joker that danny shaped upon the world as batman animated series would create many of joker’s greatest tales he shaped on the screen:clips below are joker versions each diffrent then the other

This series started out strongly by pitting the demented antics of the Joker against Two-Face’s own brand of twisted logic, but soon lost its footing… although in The Joker #6 O’Neil did write a particularly fun story entirely based around Sherlock Holmes references. Denny O’Neil would continue to write Batman comics for years. He tried his hands at different kinds of stories, including a couple of Unsolved Cases of the Batman, where he challenged himself to write tales in which the Dark Knight would fail while still providing a satisfying resolution (he came closest with ‘The Galileo Solution’). O’Neil also returned to the al Ghul clan quite a few times – under his scripts, Talia married Bruce against his will (‘I Now Pronounce You Batman and Wife!’); Ra’s had the original Batwoman killed off as part of a plan to take over the League of Assassins (‘The Vengeance Vow’); Batman and Ra’s teamed up first to prevent the Earth from turning into crystal (‘The Crystal Armageddon’) and then to keep the Sensei from assassinating the world’s religious leaders for purely artistic reasons (‘Requiem for a Martyr!’); Talia and Batman had a bittersweet reunion (‘The Monkey Trap’); and we were finally given a close look at Ra’s origin (‘Birth of the Demon’). Oh, right, and the al Ghul family also hung out with the Batman-wannabe hero Azrael a bunch of times, even helping him discover that he was a motherless test tube baby whose genes had been spliced with those of various animals (‘Fallen Angel’). Bummer.O’Neil’s other massive contribution to the Batman universe may not be as evident at first sight. I’m talking about his phenomenal series The Question

This was one of those runs, so in vogue in the ’80s and ’90s, where the author shockingly killed off an established protagonist on the very first issue in order to completely reinvent the character. Although not as extreme a revamp as Alan Moore’s Swamp Thing, Neil Gaiman’s Black Orchid, or James Robinson’s Starman, O’Neil nevertheless had the objectivist vigilante known as the Question (Vic Sage) practically beaten to death, shot in the head with a pellet gun, and thrown into the river, only for him to come back as a Zen martial arts expert who fought against villains of different philosophies. The series was not set in Gotham, but in Hub City – which somehow managed to be even more corrupt and decadent, run as it initially was by a crazy reverend and an alcoholic mayor. Yet there were key links to the Batman universe: the Dark Knight had a cameo early on and the two heroes soon teamed up (it was the Question who set up Batman’s first encounter with the cult character Lady Shiva); the series introduced Santa Prisca, birthplace of the villain Bane, as well as the mute Harold Allnut, who became a regular assistant in the Batcave. And in an inspired move, the Question fought the Riddler… and won by asking him about life’s greatest mysteries! The Question and his supporting characters would later show up in various Batman-related comics, most notably in those starring Azrael and the Huntress. Furthermore, when Vic Sage died of cancer in 2006, fan-favorite ex-Gotham City cop Renee Montoya took over his legacy.

The Question’s biggest impact on Batman, though, was arguably more subtle. Its twisted crime stories and the proto-noir mood evocative of Will Eisner’s The Spirit (which, for those of you not in the know, is the highest compliment you can pay to a comic) seem to have hugely influenced a whole generation of writers. I wonder how many of the sickest Batman tales in the last decades were a product of the trauma inflicted by this page:

Regardless, as writer alone which is to say, even disregarding his decisive role as group editor for Batman’s various titles from 1986 to 2000 – Denny O’Neil was responsible for some of the coolest stories and characters in the Dark Knight universe as he shaped the modern batman we love today.

Fantasia a golden classic masterpeice

Fantasia a golden classic masterpeice

All movie lovers have that one experience that makes them a devout fan of the art form as this movie as also wizard of oz made me fall in love with movies as its high art as they come to these classics as this movie stands to be one of the best movies ever put to the screen. A feature-length gem of a musical classical as Disney’s “Fantasia” is an enchanting work of both narrative and nonnarrative filmmaking. Made up vignettes set to well-known classical music that is so much of a classic that stands out among classic flims that i am talking about this classic movie today.

This is perhaps the best animation I’ve seen in my entire life. Even though Disney have been the best in the business when it comes to that, they’re at their best here. Even better, it’s not just one style you get to admire, but many, all of which contribute to the tone and direction of the experiences they’re trying to get across. And I shudder to think how much effort must have been needed to get this already-difficult animation to sync up with the elaborate music! You know that only those with the greatest passion and patience could pull that off as its truly the 2001 of animated flims.

Toccata and Fuge in D Minor by Johann Sebastian Bach.

Toccata and Fugue: This opening piece is the most abstract of the bunch, solely existing for the animators to show off and illustrate what images pop into their head when this piece is heard. Every frame looks like a painting, as cliched as that is to say. It’s not just the imagery itself that’s breathtaking, but the textures and the lighting. I love how the fiddles dance in the sky and become part of the artwork, like they’re taking on a mind of their own, one with the scenery. A fantastic start to the show.

Toccata and Fuge in D Minor by Johann Sebastian Bach.

I know a lot of people will start thinking of Christmas whenever they hear these tracks but for me.  I will start conjuring up images of dancing mushrooms and leaves that waltzes. My favorite moment and one that still amazes me involves some ice skating faeries.  It’s very simple animation but it mixes so well with the music.  I could not begin to fathom how long it took them to make it sync up so well as its truly a work of art to have such remarkable things on the screen. The Nutcracker Suite: Well, now I’m regretting not watching this at Christmas. But to its credit, the visuals shown off here don’t specifically invoke the holiday spirit, but rather just the spirit of life and the beauty of various creatures and environments interlinked in harmony. I love the smooth transitions between all sides of the world, how it all circles back to where it started, and that I now have my new favorite non-Christmas visuals to go with this suite. I’m definitely putting this segment back on around the holidays as its truly something that works on those times of the year but this short is so good no matter time of year you watch it upon your screen.

The Sorcerer’s Apprentice by Paul Dukas

The Sorcerer’s Apprentice: The first linear, traditional story, and one that’s much more entertaining than I expected. It’s nice to see Mickey Mouse in a more innocent time for the company he represents, and he’s packed with personality without saying a word. The escalating disaster is pretty funny, the animation is smooth as silk, and it comes at just the right time to add some relatively simple fun in between the bigger pieces. This is the most famous selection of this  feature.It stars Mickey Mouse as an assistant to a powerful wizard. When he is giving a task to fill the well. Micky instead decides to use the wizard’s magic and what results is not something he had planned.  This is is the first one that tells an actual story and it’s impressive how much with only visuals and songs but no dialogue.  I think too many movies now use talking just to fill up time when there really doesn’t need to have any at all Rite of Spring by Igor Straviknsky

Rite of Spring: This is tied for my favorite part of the movie. Not just because I grew up a huge dino geek, but because it captures the unbelievable wonder of the Earth’s history as interpreted at the time. I would have liked more of the underwater portion, but the sheer weight and magnitude of the evolution of life are still magnificently portrayed. And while we all knew the ending would be grim, it still caught me off guard with how dour it was to see the slow, painful suffering and demise of these animals we’ve come to both love and fear. Outstanding stuff. Disney animators bring to you the beginning stages of evolution.  From the formation of the planet Earth to it’s first inhabitants, the Dinosaurs.  I wondered if there was any controversy about this sequence when it was first released as its truly a marvelous work of animation.

The Pastoral Symphony by Ludwig Von Beethoven

The Pastoral Symphony: Centaurs creep me out, okay? You can say they’re awesome or beautiful or whatever, but their designs are almost nightmarish to me with the human top halves and full four-legged bottom halves. But objectively speaking, this was another great segment. It’s really cool that they went this direction in interpreting the symphony, and you come to really enjoy the lives these creatures live and how they interact with one another. You’re therefore fearful when it’s threatened, but of course it all turns out well in the end. Mythical creatures, dance, fall in love , get drunk and party all through out the day.  That is until Zeus ruins it all by throwing lighting and rain at everyone.  There is one character who comes to the party  just completely trashed, but the movie never addresses it as a problem.  I find that to be quite bold for a movie to feature this.  Especially an animated one as its truly a marvel of animation.

Dance of the hours by Amicare Ponchiell

In this section we see different  animals represent the stages of time during the day.  Ostriches are the morning, the hippo is the afternoon, the elephant is the evening and The alligator is the night.  All characters converge near the end and do a great dance with each other.  This one has a lot of humor to it and just knowing that they hand animated this to the track makes it that much more impressive.

Night on Bald Mountain by Modest Mussorgsky and Ave Maria by Franz Schubert.

Night on Bald Mountain / Ave Maria: But I’m happy to say that we end on my other joint-favorite piece. The Bald Mountain portion looks and feels absolutely gigantic, with its intimidating demonic entity that’s animated with an almost uncanny valley quality. It’s deliciously sick how he’s content to essentially steal souls from their resting places just to play with them like toys. While he doesn’t really do anything, you feel the evil within him. Also, they show nipples twice, what?? The Ave Maria portion may go on a minute or two too long, but considering it’s closing the whole film off, I don’t mind. It’s the perfect follow-up to something so dark, giving you a deep sigh of relief with the lovely music and peaceful, serene, almost still animation. I don’t know who thought to combine these two sets, but the contrast is perfect, and leaves you on the warmest note possible as its also something that is truly moving upon the screen. I remember this giving me nightmares when I was a kid, and I can imagine kids having the same reaction after watching this.  Satan himself appears on top of a mountain  and raises the souls of the dead to dance and perform for his amusement.  The ending of this selection is still pretty messed up to this day.  Especially considering that this is a Disney Feature. I could swear that in some scenes there was nudity, but it happens so fast.  Most parents won’t have time to gripe and kids will barely notice it. The use of Ave Maria is a perfect way to end the program as it brings up feelings of hope and that no matter what bad things come our way.  There is always going to be brighter days ahead as its so marvelous to watch upon the screen. Fantasia is a masterclass example of why animation is a medium, not a genre, and why it shouldn’t be seen as just for children. In fact, this is Disney at their most adult, displaying the endless possibilities of their craft with something that anyone can latch onto. Light and dark, straightforward and ambiguous, serious and frivolous this film has it all. And while I lament how far this company is now from such revolutionary genius,

One of my favorite Disney films of all time. Almost everything in the film works just perfectly. Rather it is from the new way of storytelling the film presents, the fantastic cinematography in each segment, the breathtaking and beautiful animation, and the phenomenal classical music that is in every segment. Not only do all of those things make this film so perfect to watch but what also makes this film so good is how unique it is. It’s not every day where you get a film like this. I can’t even imagine how hard the animators and composers worked on this film to make it as amazing as possible. Also, that’s another thing that makes it unique. Instead of the actors taking the spotlight in the film that would go to the animators who would animate the beautiful animation and composers who would conduct the phenomenal music throughout each of the segments which really shows how original and unique the film is. If I would have to pick a favorite segment from the film, it would be Night on Bald Mountain . The segment not only has amazing animation but has probably the best musical score out of all the segments in the film.

If I had to nitpick anything with the film it would be that some of the segments are very slow-paced particularly with Toccata and Fugue in D Minor, The Nutcracker Suite, and Rite of Spring While they are still great segments they can be pretty slow and they could’ve been a bit faster than they were but that’s just a nitpick. I think it goes without saying that I just adore this film. It may not be for everyone but it still is, in my opinion, a perfect example of what you could do with the animation medium. If you’re a Disney fan, animation fan, classical music fan, or just a fan of films in general then you must need to see this film. One of the greatest Disney films of all time and just one of the best-animated films of all time as this movie stands the test of time. i would say even to talk it made me love it even more as this movie is a marvel to watch upon the screen so i hope you enjoyed my talk today about this marvelous classic movie.

That Darn Cat Review: 60’s Live-Action Disney At Its Best

That Darn Cat Review: 60’s Live-Action Disney At Its Best

so today l look upon a favorite movie of mine as i talk about that darn cat.That Darn Cat! is directed by Robert Stevenson, who also directed a handful of fantastic Disney films such as Mary Poppins, The Love Bug (another Dean Jones connection here), Bedknobs and Broomsticks, and Darby O’Gill and the Little People among other wonderful classics.This movie really is such a joy to watch.

That Darn Cat! tells the tale of D.C. (Darn Cat), a Siamese cat of superior intellect, who begrudgingly plays a major role in capturing villainous, bank robbing kidnappers as its just not really deep in that promise but yet it charms you.

D.C. was played by cat actor Syn along with a number of backup cat actors, which is customary for cat roles.  Syn had previously starred in the Disney film The Incredible Journey as Tao.  As trainer Bill Koehler explained in a press interview for the film, Syn Cat was born in Ontario, California and sadly dumped in a pound at the age of two by owners who did not care for his standoffishness.  Koehler picked him up for five dollars and trained him to act.  Syn reportedly took to acting quickly, and his keen hearing proved to be an asset as he would react to a bell tone up to 500 feet away, especially when a tidbit was offered.

The film’s two main villains are Neville Brand as Dan and Frank Gorshin as Iggy. I was amazed to see Frank Gorshin in the film, as he played the Riddler in the 1960s ‘Batman’ TV series. There’s also Elsa Lanchester who’s the ‘nosey’ Mrs. McDougall and William Demarest as Mr. Wilmer MacDougall as mong the cast are so many remarkble legends of the screen.

There’s also Hayley Mills who plays the main female role, Patti Randall. I’ve seen Hayley Mills before as she was in ‘The Moon-Spinners’. This was apparently Hayley Mills’ last film for Disney. I find it funny to see an English girl living in an American suburb in the 1960s and owning a Siamese cat. Mills plays a suburban teenager, Patti Randall, who lives with her older sister Ingrid and their cat ‘DC’ (their parents are conveniently absent, travelling abroad). Through a series of coincidences, Patti comes to believe that DC knows the whereabouts of two hoodlums who have kidnapped a bank-teller in a robbery. She approaches an FBI agent, Zeke Kelso, who sets up base in the house, and they proceed to track the cat’s movements at night through a series of comical chase sequences. Needless to say, the criminals are eventually apprehended; and in the final scenes, various romantic sub-plots (between Ingrid and Zeke, between Patti and her surfing-obsessed boyfriend Canoe, and even one involving DC himself) are safely resolved.

I simply adore That Darn Cat!’ a fiim I enjoyed this wonderful comedy classic throughout the film as well as the suspense of a crime being solved involving bank robbery and a kidnapping with a Siamese cat. This is definitely a 1965 Disney film that I wouldn’t mind seeing again. 

‘The Cat From Outer Space’ or — Purr-ticle Physics?

‘The Cat From Outer Space’ or — Purr-ticle Physics?

What if you could hear your pet’s thoughts? What if your pet was actually from a highly advanced extraterrestrial society? Today i look upon an overlooked movie form the disney vault that is Purr-ticle Physics as cats purrfic fun to watch.

Jake (voice of Ronnie Schell) is an alien who closely resembles a cat that lands his disabled spaceship on earth and is unable to get help from his mothership to return back to his planet. Using his powerful collar that allows him to speak telepathically he seeks the assistance of Frank Wilson (Ken Berry) a lab assistant who seems smart enough to understand Jake’s dilemma. Before they can do anything though the army comes in and takes the spaceship and stores it inside a warehouse under tight security forcing Frank and the cat to break into the building in order to retrieve the ship and get the cat back to his planet.

The collar, which allows the cat to many things with it as He, or anyone else touching it, can do virtually anything even flying through the air or moving other objects through mind control. The thing is so Stilton powerful that you hardly feel that the cat is in any type of real danger, which hurts any potential tension. The plot has one caveat, which is if the collar is ever taken off of the cat then he is helpless. Yet this rarely occurs and when it does he, or somebody else, is able to retrieve it quickly making this plot-point a mute issue. The collar even allows him to fly a disabled plane making me wonder why then he couldn’t just use it to do the same thing to his disabled spaceship

M*A*S*H fans will immediately recognize Harry Morgan and McLean Stevenson. Morgan plays General Stilton, who hates Russkies, Italians and intellectuals. Did you know that “IQs”—people like physicists, engineers and biologists—spend all their time on tennis courts? Neither did I, until Stilton enlightened me “Get them IQs off their tennis courts!!!”).  

Stevenson plays Dr. Link, a scientist with a massive gambling addiction. At least 30-40 minutes of this 104-minute film is devoted to gambling: football, basketball, horse racing, and billiards. We also learn that using a magical feline to change the outcome of games to win bets is perfectly fine. Nothing but wholesome life lessons from Disney, yes sir! 

My first thought on seeing “primal mainstream” was “HIPPIE ALERT!” Jake’s collar taps into the “primal mainstream,” thus allowing Jake to talk to humans, fly around and do anything he wants. It feel like born to be wild fun moment that really captures the tone of this fun little gem. 

(“puchsia”?). The effects really don’t matter much—the cartoonish acting and forced script steal all of the limelight. Yet they are effective for this b-movie feel which fits this movie’s tone purrfect I was charmed by the premise of this film, and Jake’s actors were well trained and adorable. The voice acting was also quite good and the voice fit the cat and character. One concern we had was that of the sedation of the cat actors.

According to cinemacats.com, some audiences have questioned the ethics of sedating an actor for filming purposes, but based on our research the cats were not seriously harmed in any way during the filming of this movie. In particularly dangerous scenes, real cat actors were obviously replaced with stuffed animals as this movie is such a joy to watch as I love b-movies like this silly little gem.

So, if you’re in the mood for a nostalgic, campy, and uproarious adventure that’s as delightful as a basket of kittens and so silly you’ll find yourself embracing it fully, look no further. The Cat From Outer Space is the cat-astrophic, uh, I mean, fantastic film you’ve been waiting for! Grab your popcorn and get ready to be whisker-ed away into a world of cosmic comedy and kitt-tastic capers as I hope you enjoyed my look upon this classic gem.

When Science and Philosophy Both Go Awry The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)

When Science and Philosophy Both Go Awry The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)

I guess what makes Sci-Fi such a popular genre is the way it takes fantastic or exploitative elements and uses them to present a story that is not only entertaining but, at its best, also thought-provoking. It is a genre where the visuals are frequently required to play a significant role, although I get feeling some of the more modern efforts play this up to the detriment of other aspects. Ideally, a successful Sci-Fi film ought to be a blend of interesting and/or well-realized effects and solid, challenging writing. And the emphasis really needs to be placed firmly on the latter, in my opinion. The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957) constitutes a textbook example of what I’m talking about, with direction by Jack Arnold and a script (adapted from his own novel) by Richard Matheson two accomplished genre practitioners as today i talk about this classic movie today.

The Incredible Shrinking Man is really a journey in search of oneself and, in the course of this quest, becomes a journey into the self. It’s all a matter of perception, ultimately; Scott starts out as man who defines himself in relation to the way the world around him perceives him. As he becomes physically smaller, so his sense of worth and vitality even virility when it comes to his marriage are diminished.

There’s an intensifying frustration as he feels himself becoming less significant, transformed into a curiosity at best. But the moment he moves from the world he has known into the now nightmarish frontier that his own basement has become another change begins to take place. Forced to fall back on his own inventiveness and innate sense of survival, he comes to regard himself in a very different light. This is the point where Arnold’s directorial skills and Matheson’s writing make themselves most apparent Scott’s battle to overcome the obstacles that nature has cast into his path restores his faith, and by extension ours too. There’s a sudden realization that the terms by which he had previously defined himself were wrong, or at least too rigid to be true. It all builds to that marvelous revelation that the smaller he becomes, the less it actually matters; in the grand scheme of things he continues to exist and influence whatever little corner of the universe he occupies, therefore his significance is not less just different. Everyday things such as pins and scissors — so mundane to us — are now weapons of war and tools for survival. The science is strong, the prose of pesticides and radiation dangling deftly in the narrative, the fear of the atomic age knocking at the door.

It’s not just a physical journey, but a psychological one. Hope is dangled, both medically and in the meeting of someone of his own kind. But Scott Carey is a victim of cruel fate, a man in the wrong place at the wrong time, thrusting him into a world he can’t control. Can he survive and adapt? If so, he may be opened up to some sort of revelation, where metaphysical existentialism can come crawling through the gloom to reveal itself. Scott Carey’s world is brilliantly realized by director Jack Arnold and his team, with over-sized props, nifty special effects and a miniature POV filming style that lets us in on the terror and angst of a man forced to evaluate his place in the universe. Grant Williams is excellent, begging the question as to why his career didn’t reach better heights. The mental transformation of Scott Carey is smartly layered by the actor, and his oral narration pulses with emotion and reasoning. All told it’s a great production, a great film. Don’t be fooled into thinking it’s a piece of sci-fi schlock. It deserves better respect than that as its truly a scfi classic that truly shines upon the screen.

bewitched reflections

bewitched reflection

This series had brilliant writing for the first and possibly the second season. The characters had depth and grew and changed like real people. Serious themes were explored. Endora was even moving toward acceptance of her son-in-law as the series grew along it did have somewhat lesser later seasons but the show was always so much fun to watch for me. as this show still caputres my heart. so these are my bewitched reflections.

Watching the colorful caricature of Elizabeth Montgomery as Samantha cross the moon on her broom during the opening theme of Bewitched always made me feel at home wherever it was one as Darrin and Endora, Maurice, Aunt Clara, or Uncle Arthur.

Uncle Arthur look upon a comedy classic icon

The character of Uncle Arthur always appealed to my pun-loving nature, and the practical jokes he loved to play while slyly grinning and ensnaring his latest victim of warlock waywardness appealed to my teenage sense of fun. Paul Lynde’s performances as Uncle Arthur inspired me to make fun if I wasn’t having any, and look for the laughter where there might not be any.

But his first appearance on Bewitched had nothing to do with Endora’s younger brother, Arthur. The very first time Paul Lynde appeared on Bewitched in 1966, he had to tell Samantha how rotten she was. He didn’t want to, but it was his job.

That signature style of snappy comebacks obviously couldn’t be ignored, and six or seven months later, in October of 1965, Lynde morphed into Uncle Arthur, a man no longer belittled, but empowered. Hailed by Endora (Agnes Moorehead) as the “Clown Prince of the Cosmos,” Lynde’s wisecracking warlock was not long-winded, just lively. His magical powers rivaled Endora’s and they often had round one, round two, and round three before the final bell when the credits would roll. Somehow the endless monikers Endora bestowed on Darrin because she couldn’t bear to use his real name never seemed to inspire Uncle Arthur to rename Endora. But I would have loved to see him try. Endearing? No that can’t have anything to do with Endora. Endymion? Unendurable?Endifferent? Endoscopy?

Everyone’s favorite warlock punster always must have been a ratings booster, and if he wasn’t, I’d be surprised. “The Joker is a Card” is Uncle Arthur’s first official “pop in” to “Sammy’s” place, and if you weren’t amused by Lynde’s nasally pronunciation of “Sammy” while flashing teeth in that permanently formed smile, you missed part of his initial charm. It wasn’t so much the words or the puns, it was his delivery. He loved to accentuate those plays on words with his signature grin and a twinkle-twinkle-twink in his eyes. I always knew Uncle Arthur was up to something. He always had a gag and a pun, just to put “Sammy” in a good mood.

Endora a magical mother in law that caputred our hearts

It’s a fun show to watch and it had some great actors and actress that would show up. Agnes Moorehead who played Endora was part of the Mercury Theatre with Orson Welles as she was such a joy to watch anytime she would curse him to some strange fates as the many fates he had to endure.

Granted Darrin Three Wishes

On the surface, this seems like a nice thing for Endora to do, but it’s really a way for her to test Darrin without his knowledge. Endora spends her time convincing Sam that Darrin’s wished to avoid a business trip to Honolulu so he could look after a client, who happens to be a beautiful model. It gets worse when he accompanies her to Boston and then gets stuck during a freak snowstorm, and when she answers the phone in his hotel room as Sam calls.

Yet, Darrin had given his room to her and slept at the airport, innocent all along, though Sam comes close to leaving him until he proves to her his three wishes were never used. Endora had Sam convinced that Darrin wasn’t faithful, and Darrin came close to losing his wife because of it. Too close a call there.

Labor Pains

While Samantha is pregnant with their first child, Darrin initially waits on her hand and foot. That is, until Larry gives him advice and a book that say otherwise, encouraging him to let Samantha be more active. Darrin switches gears and orders her around instead, so Endora decides to cast a spell on Darrin so he knows exactly what Samantha’s going through in her pregnancy.

Cursed Darrin To Be A Werewolf

Angry that Darrin won’t allow Samantha to accompany her to a traditional Halloween ceremony, Endora gets petty and turns herself into a little girl and renders Darrin a werewolf, just when he’s supposed to be entertaining a new potential client, no less!

Endora doesn’t exactly have the best timing, and the fact that she takes out her pettiness just in time to threaten Darrin’s job isn’t her best moment. At least Darrin got a genuine Halloween experience out of it.

Bewitched tv classics reviews

A Is for Aardvark review

Here we see how power corrupts. We explore the meaning of life. When Samantha makes the house cooperate with Darrin, while he is bedridden, Darrin gradually reexamines all of his assumptions toward life. It’s truly a very good tale which we have very wonderful acting by its cast with a wonderful scripted tale that truly shows us what power if abused upon. I truly adore this tale. It has a moral lesson that really makes it even better to watch again and again this charming gem of a tale.

Eye of the Beholder review

Endora always like to have fun, particularly at Darrin’s expense and she seizes the perfect opportunity to send him into a blind panic when she comes across an old painting in an antique shop and artfully changes it to appear as though it is a portrait of Samantha, dated 1690. Darrin is positively alarmed when he comes across it and tries to hide it from Sam but when she finds it in a closet; she quickly puts two and two together and realizes what Endora is up to. This is a very wonderful tale to watch anytime.

Abner Kadabra review

Gladys Kravitz (Alice Pearce) is convinced that she has finally caught Samantha out doing something that can’t be explained, after all, it just isn’t possible for pictures to jump off a wall and hover about in mid-air before rearranging themselves. Or is it?

This is truly one of the funniest stories of the series as it’s truly funny to watch the cast act out such very funny and witty storytelling that matches closely to its roots form classic comedies. It’s truly a wonderful classic tale that you can enjoy.

My memories of the show

I recall as a boy watching this show as I tuned it often in morning when I was waking up eating breakfast as a boy for school I would laugh ass off at some of the funny moments as the charm of the series just made me smile so much. I adore this wonderful series so much. Montgomery and Agnes Moorehead and dick York among many other wonderful talents all made magic happen upon the screen. It is a series that remains forever in my heart. I hope you liked my look upon this classic show as i revisited one of my early artcles to touch it up as i decided to do more to give it more magical feeling as would be honorable for such a classic like bewitched.

SHARE THIS:

How Francis Ford Coppola Breathed New Life into ‘Bram Stoker’s Dracula’

So today I talk about Francis Ford Coppola Breathed New Life into ‘Bram Stoker’s Dracula as i feel this subject is highly very well regarded to me as I love the origins of it as also movies so much so to talk about this amazing gem is something enjoyable. So i hope enjoy it.

How Francis Ford Coppola Breathed New Life into ‘Bram Stoker’s Dracula’

It could be deemed rather poetic that the origins of two of the most iconic and beloved horror movie creatures can be traced back to a single weekend in summer 1816 hosted by Lord Byron. it is worth remembering the intriguing events that inspired Shelley’s classic tale. In the summer of 1816, dominated by awful weather, Shelley and her future husband Percy Bysshe Shelley visited Lord Byron’s villa next to Lake Geneva in Switzerland. One night, with the weather preventing them from going outdoors, they sat down and agreed to engage in a contest to create a terrifying ghost story as both both Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and John Polidori’s The Vampyre were the result of a writing challenge proposed by the poet himself, prompting his guests to come up with their own ghost stories. It was this undeniable power of the imagination manifesting itself as the written word that, ultimately, led to director Francis Ford Coppola falling in love with what would later become the world’s most popular vampire. It also made him realize the extent to which the blood-sucking Count is capable of both mesmerizing and terrifying audiences. The story goes as follows: when Coppola was 17, he worked as a drama camp counselor. His then-girlfriend had the same job but was working for a nearby affiliated camp. In order to get the 9-year-old campers to sleep so that he could go see her, the future filmmaker would read to them Irish author Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel Dracula in its entirety. Was the novel sleep-inducing? Hardly. But to Coppola, it seemed like a good idea at the time. Fast forward to a couple of decades later and here we have the critically acclaimed director of cinematic masterpieces such as The Godfather trilogy and Apocalypse Now, presented with the opportunity to direct a movie based on that very same novel. Oh, there’s no question that I rose to take the opportunity to direct it because I had actually read the book in such detail to those kids in camp. I was a drama major in school, so I was already thinking of this as a career. And I loved as a kid to go with my older brother to see the Dracula movies, including Abbott and Costello Meets Dracula. Our favorite Dracula, believe it or not, was John Carradine. But those movies didn’t really adapt the book.” —Francis Ford Coppola. What better way to adapt the book into a faithful movie than to do it yourself. James V. Hart’s script (he would later write Contact) was brought to Coppola’s attention by Winona Ryder, who wished to meet with the director and talk things out after having abandoned The Godfather: Part III at the last minute, thereby causing a delay in production and forcing Coppola to replace Ryder with his own daughter Sofia, a choice critics and audiences alike did not meet with much enthusiasm. But the initial plans for Hart’s adapted screenplay included it being turned into a TV movie directed by Michael Apted. Once Coppola decided to sit in the director’s chair, Apted was out of his primary job, but went on to become the movie’s executive producer.Columbia Pictures gave the director $40 million to make Bram Stoker’s Dracula, which soon became one of the biggest movies of 1992 as it would soon become one of the most successful projects of Coppola’s career, earning $215 million worldwide, saving Coppola and George Lucas’ production company American Zoetrope from bankruptcy and winning three Academy Awards: Eiko Ishioka won for Best Costume Design, Greg Cannom, Michèle Burke, and Matthew W. Mungle for Best Make-Up and Tom C. McCarthy and David E. Stone for Best Sound Editing. And while it is commonplace for movies to have tie-in merchandise upon their home release, it was not a likely scenario for R rated films, unless they were part of a popular franchise. Luckily for Bram Stoker’s Dracula, the odds seemed to have been in his favor—the film received a video game, replica weapons, a pinball game, as well as a VHS box shaped like a coffin and a comic book written by Roy Thomas and illustrated by Mike Mignola. All of this despite the fact that the movie press nicknamed it Bonfire of the Vampires before its release a reference to The Bonfire of the Vanities, which bombed heavily at the box office in 1990 due to the film’s alleged rising costs and problematic test screenings, which resulted in Hollywood insiders calling it too violent and too odd to succeed. But succeed it did and not despite its oddness because of it is truly standing out among his flims.

“Winona Rider. She told me she loved this Dracula script that was very much like the book. And then I thought, well, Dracula was written at the same time as cinema was invented. What if I made Dracula much in the way that the earliest cinema practitioners would have? You know, making a thing that is in fact what it is also about.” —Francis Ford Coppola. What Coppola did with his gothic horror movie in terms of visual effects was something many considered strange and unreasonable, but for the visionary, it was the only right way to go about it if he wanted not only the script, but also the movie’s tone to be faithful to its source material and the time period it takes place in. His take on the visuals is also one of the main reasons why both audiences and critics look back at Bram Stoker’s Dracula 27 years later with awe and tremendous respect. Making the movie “in the way that the earliest cinema practitioners would have” meant renouncing CGI or digital VFX. When wanting to implement his vision, his Visual Effects team told him it could not be done without modern digital technology. They were, in Coppola’s words, “as they always do, leading me down the path to do it the way everybody else does it.” As a result, the director fired all of them and instead hired his son Roman, a magic enthusiast, who was in his mid-twenties at the time: “And in a sense I began to realize that it was only my own family, my son whom I have raised in this style of adventure, who would be there shoulder to shoulder with me, pushing it to be what I hoped it could be like as Roman he put it:  It was just the challenge of doing it the hard way and the pleasure of knowing that was how it was done in the past. And we were staying in that tradition.” In order to create the wanted visual effects, father and son used every (magic) trick in the book, thus paying homage to the previous one hundred years of filmmaking: rear projection, reverse motion, matte paintings, miniature effects, front projection, forced perspective and multiple exposures. They shot the majority of the movie on sound stages as opposed to actual locations, which in turn only emphasized the movie’s peculiar picture-book quality. “You photograph a scene and then you make good notes and you put it in the refrigerator and a week later you take the film out and then put it in the camera, and re-photograph the next element in some cases ) In some cases, we passed the film through the camera three or four times before it was developed. It’s very difficult, but the photography you get is very beautiful as to what came out.

Another interesting aspect of the effects is the use of shadows. According to the director, natural laws would not “work” in the presence of vampires—by showing shadows acting of their own accord, emancipated from whoever cast them, he wanted to highlight Bram Stoker’s Dracula’s supernatural elements. It should come as no surprise that the shadow scenes were directly influenced by F.W. Murnau’s Nosferatu, with German cinematographer Michael Ballhaus crediting the 1922 classic for serving as inspiration in terms of both cinematography and visual design. Ballhaus himself perfectly captures Coppola’s disturbing vision with utter self-confidence, helping the director transmit the aforementioned essence of cinema’s illusionist roots while at the same time creating something entirely new and different. Coppola planned every shot very carefully and diligently, crafting a storyboard with about a thousand images. He then made a choppy animated movie out of the drawings, added music, as well as scenes from Jean Cocteau’s 1946 version of Beauty and the Beast and paintings done by Gustav Klimt and other symbolists. He showed the film to his designers so that they would get the feel of what he was striving to achieve. When it came to costumes, he asked the set costume designers to present him with designs that were “weird.” As he later recalled: “‘Weird’ became a code word for ‘Let’s not do formula (…) Give me something that either comes from the research or that comes from your own nightmares.’ I gave them paintings, and I gave them drawings, and I talked to them about how I thought the imagery could work Weird is, in fact, the best possible adjective one can attribute to Coppola’s take on Bram Stoker’s Dracula. From visual effects and set design, all the way to costume design—not one aspect of his movie bears any resemblance to normalcy. Yet it was only with the actors’ performances that this inherent weirdness could be taken not one, but several steps further. Gary Oldman put on the titular character’s fangs and cape, and did so with utter devotion. Coppola stated that Oldman was on set three weeks before they began filming, working with make-up crews and costume designers so as to get ready for the many (prosthetic) forms the Count would take on. One such form—arguably the scariest one was that of a giant bat, but Oldman was not convinced that the costume was frightening. This is why the director instructed Oldman to go around the set and whisper terrifying things into the actors’ ears so that their fear of him would be genuine. In fact, Coppola stated that Oldman himself was crucial for the creation of the majority of the Count’s personas: “He loves cooking up ideas. He’s a very intelligent person. It’s a pity that he gets cast as villains too much of the time as not everyone was impressed with Oldman’s acting methods. His co-star Winona Ryder, who played Mina, Dracula’s reincarnated love interest whom he had crossed “oceans of time” for, allegedly had a falling out with the British actor early on. No one knew what the reason was, but Ryder herself labeled the experience as traumatic, stating that she “felt there was a danger” while collaborating with him. She later on referenced their time together on the set, saying: “He [Gary] was going through a divorce, and I think I can say this because he’s pretty open about it, but he’s been sober for a long time now, and he’s raised three kids, and he’s a dream. He’s a good friend of mine now…”

Another actor that proved to be difficult to work with on set at the time was Anthony Hopkins, who stepped into the shoes of vampire hunter Van Helsing, a role that almost went to Liam Neeson. But the one who was frustrated with Hopkins was not another co-star, but rather Coppola himself. While the director wanted his actors to read the source material, Hopkins did not show any interest and refused to rehearse scenes prior to shooting. Although Coppola was not too pleased during the filming process, he later on stated that the spontaneous way Hopkins had gone about it probably resulted in more authenticity goes as he always goes for the best of that notion in his work. When it comes to authenticity, one actor sadly did not do his role justice and was heavily criticized for his emotionally stiff performance and his abysmal attempt at a British accent—Keanu Reeves was cast in the role of Mina’s soon-to-be-husband Jonathan Harker who ends up trapped inside Dracula’s castle in Transylvania while the Count is off seducing his fiancé in London. Well aware of the backlash his performance got, Reeves defended himself by saying that he had been exhausted from previous projects while filming Bram Stoker’s Dracula and had thus had nothing more to give. But the person who really came to his and his accent’s rescue was none other than Coppola, who stated: “He tried so hard. That was the problem, actually—he wanted to do it perfectly and in trying to do it perfectly it came off as stilted. I tried to get him to just relax with it and not do it so fastidiously. So maybe I wasn’t as critical of him, but that’s because I like him personally so much. To this day he’s a prince in my eyes.” —Francis Ford Coppola on Keanu Reeves.

And just as Keanu stayed a prince in Coppola’s eyes, so did Dracula remain one in Mina’s right until the very end. For the most prominent change in regards to the source material is the introduction of a romantic relationship between the Count and his chosen one—a plot thread that does not occur in the novel, but is at the very heart of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, making the movie primarily a love story, a simultaneously erotic and tragic one. But with eros and thanatos usually being two sides of the same coin in the world of horror, it should come as no surprise that Coppola’s movie ended up being a profoundly erotic work of art, resembling, in the director’s own words, an “erotic dream”—Harker’s sexual encounter with Dracula’s Brides (Monica Bellucci, Florina Kendrick and Michaele Bercu), a cornucopia of intertwined limbs, mouths and chests; Dracula, in wolf form, drinking the blood of Mina’s writhing and sighing friend Lucy (Sadie Frost); Dracula and Mina performing the ritual of mutual blood-drinking while professing their undying love for one another. It is not implied that drinking another’s blood is an intense sexual experience for all parties involved—it is repeatedly shown. But for all the eroticism displayed, the character of Dracula is not immediately portrayed as being a sexual predator or the ultimate big bad. He is instead introduced as a tragic hero who rebels against God upon being prematurely parted from his loved one. His vampirism is therefore not treated as a lifestyle he necessarily revels in, but rather a curse he has learned to live, or better yet, survive, with. The entire motivation behind his choices is not to kill for the sake of killing—especially because the notion of feasting is portrayed as being a highly sexual act in and of itself—but rather to do whatever he deems necessary in order to end his loneliness by winning Mina over, making her remember her previous incarnation so that she can choose to become his bride again: “Do you believe in destiny? That even the powers of time can be altered for a single purpose? That the luckiest man who walks on this earth is the one who finds true love?” It is because of this characterization, as well as Oldman’s fantastic portrayal, that it comes quite naturally to us viewers to empathize with the titular anti-hero and cheer his love story on, all the while being well aware that a happy ending is not the endgame we are meant to get. The bittersweetness of the movie’s final shots serves as a cherry on top of an intense, vivid, feverish and sensual ride, one which Coppola dare devilishly took us on when he decided to breathe new life into the world’s most famous vampire as this movie would breath such life into that classic myth.

The year was 1992. I get a phone call at midnight in NYC. It is Francis Ford Coppola from San Francisco. He either couldn’t calculate the time difference or didn’t care. He has been in post-production on Dracula for several months and it is not going well. Another disastrous preview has the studio on edge. He asks [politely commands] me to get on a plane and come to San Francisco. He hates the film, hates the script, hates me for writing it, hates the cast, hates the studio, and he wants to show me the film to prove it. “Great, I can’t wait to see it,” I replied facetiously. It had only taken me 15 years of rejection and failure to finally get Dracula produced. And I had one of the greatest directors in history at the helm of a disaster in the making. How was that possible? What had gone wrong? Could this film ever rise from the ashes? —James V. Hart

This article, written by James V. Hart, first appeared in Creative Screenwriting. The year was 1992. I get a phone call at midnight in NYC. It is Francis Ford Coppola from San Francisco. He either couldn’t calculate the time difference or didn’t care. He has been in post-production on Dracula for several months and it is not going well. Another disastrous preview has the studio on edge. He asks [politely commands] me to get on a plane and come to San Francisco. He hates the film, hates the script, hates me for writing it, hates the cast, hates the studio, and he wants to show me the film to prove it. Great, I can’t wait to see it,” I replied facetiously. It had only taken me 15 years of rejection and failure to finally get Dracula produced. And I had one of the greatest directors in history at the helm of a disaster in the making. How was that possible? What had gone wrong? Could this film ever rise from the ashes? The next night I met Francis at the Zoetrope building on Kearny St. in San Francisco. He escorted me to the basement screening room, the Godfather room, with big leather couches, cigars, wine, brandy, two women who spoke only Romanian, and made sure I was comfortable with instructions to call him in his penthouse after I finished watching this film he hated and he would join me to discuss. He was right. For 2 hours and 10 minutes, I watched the worst piece of film I had ever seen. The one I wrote. I was comatose, destroyed, drunk, and pissed. Coppola finally called the screening room since I had not made contact. The best example of the problems the original shooting script did not reveal is the ending. This complete ending was not in the shooting script and went through several stages of additional development to arrive in its final form. In my original shooting script, Mina [Winona Ryder] and Dracula [Gary Oldman], retreat into Dracula’s castle chapel where, Dracula, mortally wounded by the Bowie knife [not a stake] plunged into his heart [yes vampires have hearts they just don’t beat], begs Mina to give him peace.Mina obliges, forcing the Bowie knife down through his heart, impaling him to the chapel floor. Mina’s curse of the vampire is lifted from her, Dracula’s soul is released and he dies in peace. Redeemed So far so good Then, according to the shooting script and the footage shot, Mina leaves Dracula’s lifeless body at the foot of his chapel cross—exits the castle——AND LAUNCHES HERSELF INTO THE ARMS OF KEANU REEVES [JONATHAN HARKER] THEN WALKS OF INTO THE TRANSYLVANIAN SUNSET AS THE MUSIC SWELLS.

The audience at the previous sneak preview booed and yelled and cursed this ending. Clearly, the audience wanted Mina and Dracula to somehow end up together.

Why couldn’t we have solved this in the script development stage before shooting to avoid ending up in the editing room with a film that does not work? How did I not realize this in the writing stages? How did Francis Ford Coppola, the Maestro living legend, not see this coming? Coppola screened an improved cut for George Lucas and Mike Mignola, a then up and coming graphic novel artist before he created Hellboy. Lucas nailed what was wrong with the ending. We had broken the rules of how to kill a vampire that we had established in the film; the only true way to kill a vampire is to cut off their head and cut out their heart, then burn it. Which is exactly what Van Helsing and his Vampire Killers do to Lucy in the film. Lucas was spot on. The rules were right there on the screen. In order for Mina to give Dracula peace, she has to cut off his head with the Bowie knife she had plunged through his heart. That meant bringing Winona and Gary back together to shoot the new moments and bits we needed to complete the narrative. Gary and Winona as literally been at each other’s throats by the second week of shooting. They had even refused to pose together for the photo shoot with the famed Albert Watson to be used for the poster promoting the film. They would never get together again for additional filming.

I remember Coppola calling me with this proposition— “Do you think we can get Winona back to cut off Gary’s head?”“It’s the only way you will get her back,” I replied.Francis assembled a crew including legendary cinematographer Michael Ballhaus, and cast, including Anthony Hopkins, Gary, and Winona, all one big happy family, back at Sony studios, months after the principal photography was completed and sets had been struck, and filmed the missing parts of the film narrative, including Winona cutting off Gary’s head. Coppola’s mastery and execution are seamless. In the film’s climax, when Mina decapitates Dracula and sets him free, there are close-ups, medium shots and high angles that were filmed almost a year apart. Bram Stoker’s Dracula opened in October of 1992 to a record-breaking $32m weekend in 1997 dollars, and went on to gross 215M worldwide on a $40m dollar budget. It was the 9th highest grossing film that year. I hope you enjoyed in-depth talk to the the history of the project to the big debut. as to give a sum up review now.

Bram Stoker’s Dracula’ sum up review

Bram Stoker’s Dracula, directed by Francis Ford Coppola, weaves the Gothic and the Romantic until intertwined cobwebs begin to appear out of its embrace. Unlike the more revered Coppola joints, it isn’t based solely on character and screenplay but on the sublime audacity of its various technical elements. While most criticisms of Dracula stem from Keanu Reeves’ ingeniously out of tune performance and its messy switches of tone, neither really add up to anything of truly negative worth as Coppola’s intent was one of visual splendor. With its myriad of optical/practical effects and its focus on costumes within the image, Dracula floats into a foggy mist of Gothic elegance. Every movement of the camera is clear, concise, and theatrical, and it raises Stoker’s landmark source material into a realm of scrumptious horror that could only be crafted for the cinema. It’s a film that communicates with shadows, colors, blood, and groans of ecstasy, and words are only used to begin a story of startling visual beauty. In Coppola’s Dracula, “the costumes are the sets.”, and it’s a statement that is immediately evident from the opening sequence. Eiko Ishioka’s costume design works in contrast with the various art direction, set decoration, and production design departments, as each are implemented as an entity to complete the image of the director. However, Ishioka’s costumes live and breathe on the particular actor, and whether its the sharp talons of Count Dracula’s carriage getup or a white Funeral garment, it is the look that defines the energy of a scene. The colors of Francis Ford Coppola films don’t act as flourishes but as foundations, and Dracula commits to lavish style as a means of grasping at Stoker’s beckoning sensuality. While previous adaptations have toyed and twisted with the level of directness, Coppola goes all out in a way that wasn’t even hinted at in the original novel. It’s Sexuality at its most untamed, and Coppola’s film moves to a beat of sincere romantic passion versus the lusty allure of desire. Above all, Bram Stoker’s Dracula is a magnificent celebration of film as a visual medium. Much like the masters of Murnau and Robert Wiene, the images on screen feel revived within a cinematic dream-scape, as if their distinct life force couldn’t be comprehended anywhere else. This is a true, honest-to-god, bona-fide movie, and it leaves me yearning for a way to somehow dive into its world and its constant stream of imagination and inventiveness. Hallucinations are only the beginning.  SFX and in-camera trickery embody a certain level of ancientness, flowing off of the screen in gooey, animated thrusts, fucking in tandem with incomparable production design and grand performers. Murnau, Weine, Bava, Raimi; a history of rabid Horror escalates Coppola’s craft into a fetishistic vista of decrepit castles, tombs, and bodies, inducing the dead and undead in a spectacular blood-sucking odyssey. As much of a fiery hallucination as the analog day-dreams of James Cameron or Joe Dante’s 1980s output as its as much a classic now as its release in 1992. its a must see classic for the ages.